1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,520 2 00:00:00,520 --> 00:00:02,149 Let's do a couple more examples 3 00:00:02,149 --> 00:00:04,310 graphing rational functions. 4 00:00:04,309 --> 00:00:11,529 So let's say I have y is equal to 2x over x plus 1. 5 00:00:11,529 --> 00:00:14,599 So the first thing we might want to do is identify our 6 00:00:14,599 --> 00:00:18,179 horizontal asymptotes, if there are any. 7 00:00:18,179 --> 00:00:20,439 And I said before, all you have to do is look at the 8 00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:23,510 highest degree term in the numerator and the denominator. 9 00:00:23,510 --> 00:00:26,210 The highest degree term here, there's only one term. 10 00:00:26,210 --> 00:00:28,140 It is 2x. 11 00:00:28,140 --> 00:00:30,449 And the highest degree term here is x. 12 00:00:30,449 --> 00:00:32,780 They're both first-degree terms. 13 00:00:32,780 --> 00:00:39,630 So you can say that as x approaches infinity, y is 14 00:00:39,630 --> 00:00:43,150 going to be-- as x gets super-large values, these two 15 00:00:43,149 --> 00:00:44,299 terms are going to dominate. 16 00:00:44,299 --> 00:00:46,279 This isn't going to matter so much. 17 00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:50,710 So then our expression, then y is going to be approximately 18 00:00:50,710 --> 00:00:57,570 equal to 2x over x, which is just equal to 2. 19 00:00:57,570 --> 00:01:00,140 That actually would also be true as x 20 00:01:00,140 --> 00:01:01,990 approaches negative infinity. 21 00:01:01,990 --> 00:01:06,439 So as x gets really large or super-negative, this is going 22 00:01:06,439 --> 00:01:07,340 to approach 2. 23 00:01:07,340 --> 00:01:09,210 This term won't matter much. 24 00:01:09,209 --> 00:01:12,329 So let's graph that horizontal asymptote. 25 00:01:12,329 --> 00:01:14,980 So it's y is equal to 2. 26 00:01:14,980 --> 00:01:15,810 Let's graph it. 27 00:01:15,810 --> 00:01:18,799 So this is our horizontal asymptote right there. 28 00:01:18,799 --> 00:01:24,000 29 00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:30,340 y is equal to 2, that right there-- let me write it down-- 30 00:01:30,340 --> 00:01:36,340 horizontal asymptote. 31 00:01:36,340 --> 00:01:39,820 That is what our graph approaches but never quite 32 00:01:39,819 --> 00:01:43,949 touches as we get to more and more positive values of x or 33 00:01:43,950 --> 00:01:45,890 more and more negative values of x. 34 00:01:45,890 --> 00:01:49,799 Now, do we have any vertical asymptotes here? 35 00:01:49,799 --> 00:01:50,700 Well, sure. 36 00:01:50,700 --> 00:01:55,409 We have when x is equal to negative 1, this equation or 37 00:01:55,409 --> 00:01:57,629 this function is undefined. 38 00:01:57,629 --> 00:02:07,030 So we say y undefined when x is equal to negative 1. 39 00:02:07,030 --> 00:02:09,800 That's definitely true because when x is equal to negative 1, 40 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:11,130 the denominator becomes zero. 41 00:02:11,129 --> 00:02:12,829 We don't know what 1/0 is. 42 00:02:12,830 --> 00:02:15,200 It's not defined. 43 00:02:15,199 --> 00:02:17,669 And this is a vertical asymptote because the x 44 00:02:17,669 --> 00:02:19,159 doesn't cancel out. 45 00:02:19,159 --> 00:02:21,490 The x plus 1-- sorry-- doesn't cancel out 46 00:02:21,490 --> 00:02:22,610 with something else. 47 00:02:22,610 --> 00:02:25,050 Let me give you a quick example right here. 48 00:02:25,050 --> 00:02:28,170 Let's say I have the equation y is equal to x plus 49 00:02:28,169 --> 00:02:31,069 1 over x plus 1. 50 00:02:31,069 --> 00:02:33,430 In this circumstance, you might say, hey, when x is 51 00:02:33,430 --> 00:02:36,730 equal to negative 1, my graph is undefined. 52 00:02:36,729 --> 00:02:39,469 And you would be right because if you put a negative 1 here, 53 00:02:39,469 --> 00:02:40,770 you get a 0 down here. 54 00:02:40,770 --> 00:02:42,420 In fact, you'll also get a 0 on top. 55 00:02:42,419 --> 00:02:45,329 You'll get a 0 over a 0. 56 00:02:45,330 --> 00:02:47,370 It's undefined. 57 00:02:47,370 --> 00:02:52,039 But as you can see, if you assume that x does not equal 58 00:02:52,039 --> 00:02:55,629 negative 1, if you assume that this term and that term are 59 00:02:55,629 --> 00:02:58,310 not equal to zero, you can divide the numerator and the 60 00:02:58,310 --> 00:03:02,340 denominator by x plus 1, or you could say, well, that over 61 00:03:02,340 --> 00:03:04,710 that, if it was anything else over itself, it 62 00:03:04,710 --> 00:03:05,950 would be equal to 1. 63 00:03:05,949 --> 00:03:14,739 You would say this would be equal to 1 when x does not 64 00:03:14,740 --> 00:03:18,340 equal negative 1 or when these terms don't equal zero. 65 00:03:18,340 --> 00:03:21,810 It equals 0/0, which we don't know what that is, when x is 66 00:03:21,810 --> 00:03:23,090 equal to negative 1. 67 00:03:23,090 --> 00:03:25,569 So in this situation, you would not 68 00:03:25,569 --> 00:03:28,139 have a vertical asymptote. 69 00:03:28,139 --> 00:03:36,609 So this graph right here, no vertical asymptote. 70 00:03:36,610 --> 00:03:38,350 And actually, you're probably curious, what does 71 00:03:38,349 --> 00:03:39,849 this graph look like? 72 00:03:39,849 --> 00:03:42,469 I'll take a little aside here to draw it for you. 73 00:03:42,469 --> 00:03:47,169 This graph right here, if I had to graph this right there, 74 00:03:47,169 --> 00:03:49,809 what this would be is this would be y is equal to 1 for 75 00:03:49,810 --> 00:03:53,250 all the values except for x is equal to negative 1. 76 00:03:53,250 --> 00:03:56,759 So in this situation the graph, it would be y is equal 77 00:03:56,759 --> 00:04:04,090 to 1 everywhere, except for y is equal to negative 1. 78 00:04:04,090 --> 00:04:06,354 And y is equal to negative 1, it's undefined. 79 00:04:06,354 --> 00:04:08,709 So we actually have a hole there. 80 00:04:08,710 --> 00:04:11,070 We actually draw a little circle around there, a little 81 00:04:11,069 --> 00:04:15,759 hollowed-out circle, so that we don't know what y is when x 82 00:04:15,759 --> 00:04:16,990 is equal to negative 1. 83 00:04:16,990 --> 00:04:19,360 So this looks like that right there. 84 00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:21,939 It looks like that horizontal line. 85 00:04:21,939 --> 00:04:23,579 No vertical asymptote. 86 00:04:23,579 --> 00:04:28,269 And that's because this term and that term cancel out when 87 00:04:28,269 --> 00:04:31,370 they're not equal to zero, when x is not equal to 88 00:04:31,370 --> 00:04:32,310 negative 1. 89 00:04:32,310 --> 00:04:34,639 So when your identifying vertical asymptotes-- let me 90 00:04:34,639 --> 00:04:36,159 clear this out a little bit. 91 00:04:36,160 --> 00:04:39,680 when you're identifying vertical asymptotes, you want 92 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,160 to be sure that this expression right here isn't 93 00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:44,080 canceling out with something in the numerator. 94 00:04:44,079 --> 00:04:45,409 And in this case, it's not. 95 00:04:45,410 --> 00:04:47,160 In this case, it did, so you don't 96 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:48,400 have a vertical asymptote. 97 00:04:48,399 --> 00:04:51,409 In this case, you aren't canceling out, so this will 98 00:04:51,410 --> 00:04:52,560 define a vertical asymptote. 99 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:56,610 x is equal to negative 1 is a vertical asymptote for this 100 00:04:56,610 --> 00:04:57,689 graph right here. 101 00:04:57,689 --> 00:05:01,719 So x is equal to negative 1-- let me draw the vertical 102 00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:04,510 asymptote-- will look like that. 103 00:05:04,509 --> 00:05:08,250 104 00:05:08,250 --> 00:05:10,079 And then to figure out what the graph is doing, we could 105 00:05:10,079 --> 00:05:12,629 try out a couple of values. 106 00:05:12,629 --> 00:05:16,269 So what happens when x is equal to 0? 107 00:05:16,269 --> 00:05:21,079 So when x is equal to 0 we have 2 times 0, which is 0 108 00:05:21,079 --> 00:05:22,800 over 0 plus 1. 109 00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:25,699 So it's 0/1, which is 0. 110 00:05:25,699 --> 00:05:31,969 So the point 0, 0 is on our curve. 111 00:05:31,970 --> 00:05:34,990 What happens when x is equal to 1? 112 00:05:34,990 --> 00:05:38,860 We have 2 times 1, which is 2 over 1 plus 1. 113 00:05:38,860 --> 00:05:41,040 So it's 2/2. 114 00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:43,310 So it's 1, 1 is also on our curve. 115 00:05:43,310 --> 00:05:45,379 So that's on our curve right there. 116 00:05:45,379 --> 00:05:47,629 So we could keep plotting points, but the curve is going 117 00:05:47,629 --> 00:05:48,730 to look something like this. 118 00:05:48,730 --> 00:05:52,020 It looks like it's going approach negative infinity as 119 00:05:52,019 --> 00:05:56,599 it approaches the vertical asymptote from the right. 120 00:05:56,600 --> 00:05:58,500 So as you go this way it, goes to negative infinity. 121 00:05:58,500 --> 00:06:03,009 And then it'll approach our horizontal asymptote from the 122 00:06:03,009 --> 00:06:03,664 negative direction. 123 00:06:03,665 --> 00:06:07,100 So it's going to look something like that. 124 00:06:07,100 --> 00:06:12,850 And then, let's see, what happens when x is equal to-- 125 00:06:12,850 --> 00:06:14,765 let me do this in a darker color. 126 00:06:14,764 --> 00:06:16,519 I'll do it in this red color. 127 00:06:16,519 --> 00:06:20,539 What happens when x is equal to negative 2? 128 00:06:20,540 --> 00:06:25,420 We have negative 2 times 2 is negative 4. 129 00:06:25,420 --> 00:06:28,420 And then we have negative-- so it's going to be negative 4 130 00:06:28,420 --> 00:06:32,949 over negative 2 plus 1, which is negative 1, 131 00:06:32,949 --> 00:06:34,759 which is just 4. 132 00:06:34,759 --> 00:06:36,459 So it's just equal to negative 2, 4. 133 00:06:36,459 --> 00:06:39,939 So negative 2-- 1, 2, 3, 4. 134 00:06:39,939 --> 00:06:43,459 Negative 2, 4 is on our line. 135 00:06:43,459 --> 00:06:46,560 And what about-- well, let's just do one more point. 136 00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:49,040 What about negative 3? 137 00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:51,536 So the point negative 3-- on the numerator, we're going to 138 00:06:51,536 --> 00:06:55,009 get 2 times negative 3 is negative 6 over negative 3 139 00:06:55,009 --> 00:06:57,569 plus 1, which is negative 2. 140 00:06:57,569 --> 00:07:01,290 Negative 6 over negative 2 is positive 3. 141 00:07:01,290 --> 00:07:04,150 So negative 3, 3. 142 00:07:04,149 --> 00:07:05,889 1, 2, 3. 143 00:07:05,889 --> 00:07:07,089 1, 2, 3. 144 00:07:07,089 --> 00:07:08,659 So that's also there. 145 00:07:08,660 --> 00:07:11,393 So the graph is going to look something like that. 146 00:07:11,392 --> 00:07:14,389 147 00:07:14,389 --> 00:07:17,569 So as we approach negative infinity, we're going to 148 00:07:17,569 --> 00:07:20,170 approach our horizontal asymptote from above. 149 00:07:20,170 --> 00:07:24,115 As we approach negative 1, x is equal to negative 1, we're 150 00:07:24,115 --> 00:07:26,269 going to pop up to positive infinity. 151 00:07:26,269 --> 00:07:30,339 So let's verify that once again this is indeed the graph 152 00:07:30,339 --> 00:07:31,179 of our equation. 153 00:07:31,180 --> 00:07:35,780 Let's get our graphing calculator out. 154 00:07:35,779 --> 00:07:46,659 We're going to define y as 2x divided by x plus 1 is equal 155 00:07:46,660 --> 00:07:51,530 to-- delete all of that out-- and then we want to graph it. 156 00:07:51,529 --> 00:07:52,649 And there we go. 157 00:07:52,649 --> 00:07:54,519 It looks just like what we drew. 158 00:07:54,519 --> 00:07:57,680 And that vertical asymptote, it connected the dots, but we 159 00:07:57,680 --> 00:07:59,240 know that it's not defined there. 160 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:01,449 It just tried to connect the super-positive 161 00:08:01,449 --> 00:08:02,490 value all the way down. 162 00:08:02,490 --> 00:08:04,660 Because it's just trying out-- all the graphing calculator's 163 00:08:04,660 --> 00:08:07,740 doing is actually just making a very detailed table of 164 00:08:07,740 --> 00:08:09,460 values and then just connecting all the dots. 165 00:08:09,459 --> 00:08:11,739 So it doesn't know that this is an asymptote, so it 166 00:08:11,740 --> 00:08:13,340 actually tried to connect the dots. 167 00:08:13,339 --> 00:08:16,349 But there should be no connection right there. 168 00:08:16,350 --> 00:08:19,189 Hopefully, you found this example useful.