1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,640 2 00:00:00,640 --> 00:00:03,980 Now I think is a good time to add some notation and 3 00:00:03,980 --> 00:00:07,560 techniques to our Laplace Transform tool kit. 4 00:00:07,559 --> 00:00:10,429 So the first thing I want to introduce is just kind of a 5 00:00:10,429 --> 00:00:12,269 quick way of doing something. 6 00:00:12,269 --> 00:00:15,490 And that is, if I had the Laplace Transform, let's say I 7 00:00:15,490 --> 00:00:18,539 want to take the Laplace Transform of the second 8 00:00:18,539 --> 00:00:22,539 derivative of y. 9 00:00:22,539 --> 00:00:25,689 Well, we proved several videos ago that if I wanted to take 10 00:00:25,690 --> 00:00:30,830 the Laplace Transform of the first derivative of y, that is 11 00:00:30,829 --> 00:00:41,060 equal to s times the Laplace Transform of y minus y of 0. 12 00:00:41,060 --> 00:00:43,969 And we used this property in the last couple of videos to 13 00:00:43,969 --> 00:00:46,170 actually figure out the Laplace Transform of the 14 00:00:46,170 --> 00:00:47,630 second derivative. 15 00:00:47,630 --> 00:00:49,780 Because if you just, you know, if you say this is y prime, 16 00:00:49,780 --> 00:00:51,640 this is the anti-derivative of it, then you could just 17 00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:52,259 pattern match. 18 00:00:52,259 --> 00:00:55,219 You could say, well, the Laplace Transform of y prime 19 00:00:55,219 --> 00:01:01,049 prime, that's just equal to s times the Laplace Transform of 20 00:01:01,049 --> 00:01:08,799 y prime minus y prime of 0. 21 00:01:08,799 --> 00:01:11,959 This is the derivative of this, just like this is the 22 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:14,429 derivative of this. 23 00:01:14,430 --> 00:01:15,900 I'll draw a line here just so you don't get confused. 24 00:01:15,900 --> 00:01:18,410 So the Laplace Transform of y prime prime is this thing. 25 00:01:18,409 --> 00:01:21,579 And now we can use this, which we proved several videos ago, 26 00:01:21,579 --> 00:01:23,739 to resubstitute it and get it in terms of the Laplace 27 00:01:23,739 --> 00:01:25,119 Transform of y. 28 00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:27,469 So we can expand this part. 29 00:01:27,469 --> 00:01:29,799 The Laplace Transform of the derivative of y, that's just 30 00:01:29,799 --> 00:01:39,769 equal to s times the Laplace Transform of y minus y of 0. 31 00:01:39,769 --> 00:01:41,369 And then we have the outside, right? 32 00:01:41,370 --> 00:01:46,290 We have s minus y prime of 0. 33 00:01:46,290 --> 00:01:48,180 And then when you expand it all out, and we've done this 34 00:01:48,180 --> 00:01:53,700 before, you get s squared times the Laplace Transform of 35 00:01:53,700 --> 00:02:02,549 y minus s times y of 0 minus y prime of 0. 36 00:02:02,549 --> 00:02:05,170 Now there's something interesting to note here, and 37 00:02:05,170 --> 00:02:07,299 if you learn this it'll make it a lot faster. 38 00:02:07,299 --> 00:02:09,250 You won't have to go through all of this and risk making 39 00:02:09,250 --> 00:02:12,979 careless mistakes when you have scarce time and paper on 40 00:02:12,979 --> 00:02:17,049 your test. Just notice that when you take the Laplace 41 00:02:17,050 --> 00:02:19,400 Transform of the second derivative, what do we end up? 42 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,150 We end up with s squared, right? 43 00:02:22,150 --> 00:02:22,939 This was the second derivative. 44 00:02:22,939 --> 00:02:25,599 So I end up with s squared times the Laplace Transform of 45 00:02:25,599 --> 00:02:30,419 y, minus s times y of 0 minus 1 times y prime of 0. 46 00:02:30,419 --> 00:02:33,709 So every term, we started with s squared, and then every term 47 00:02:33,710 --> 00:02:36,590 we lower the degree of s one, and then everything except the 48 00:02:36,590 --> 00:02:38,370 first term is a negative sign. 49 00:02:38,370 --> 00:02:41,830 And then we started with the Laplace Transform of y, and 50 00:02:41,830 --> 00:02:44,360 then you can almost view the Laplace Transform as a kind of 51 00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:46,390 integral, so we kind of take the derivatives, so 52 00:02:46,389 --> 00:02:47,699 then you get y. 53 00:02:47,699 --> 00:02:48,549 And then you take the derivative 54 00:02:48,550 --> 00:02:49,810 again, you get y prime. 55 00:02:49,810 --> 00:02:51,379 And of course every other term is negative. 56 00:02:51,379 --> 00:02:52,789 And these aren't the actual functions. 57 00:02:52,789 --> 00:02:54,599 These are those functions evaluated at 0. 58 00:02:54,599 --> 00:02:57,710 But that's a good way to help you, hopefully, remember how 59 00:02:57,710 --> 00:02:58,250 to do these. 60 00:02:58,250 --> 00:03:01,000 And once you get the hang of it, you can take the Laplace 61 00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:05,259 Transform of any arbitrary function very, very quickly. 62 00:03:05,259 --> 00:03:06,639 Or any arbitrary derivatives. 63 00:03:06,639 --> 00:03:11,549 So let's say we wanted to take the Laplace Transform of, I 64 00:03:11,550 --> 00:03:13,950 don't know, this should hit the point home, the fourth 65 00:03:13,949 --> 00:03:16,289 derivative of y. 66 00:03:16,289 --> 00:03:18,379 That 4 in parentheses means the fourth derivative. 67 00:03:18,379 --> 00:03:21,449 I could have drawn four prime marks, but either way. 68 00:03:21,449 --> 00:03:22,429 So what is this equal to? 69 00:03:22,430 --> 00:03:25,620 If we use this technique and substitute it, we're bound to 70 00:03:25,620 --> 00:03:28,129 make some form of careless mistake or other, and it would 71 00:03:28,129 --> 00:03:30,039 take us forever and it would waste a lot of paper. 72 00:03:30,039 --> 00:03:33,939 But now we see the pattern, and so we can just say, well, 73 00:03:33,939 --> 00:03:36,539 the Laplace Transform of this, in terms of the Laplace 74 00:03:36,539 --> 00:03:39,019 Transform of y, right, that's what we want to get to, is 75 00:03:39,020 --> 00:03:48,250 going to be s to the fourth times the Laplace Transform of 76 00:03:48,250 --> 00:03:51,159 y-- now every other term is going to have a minus in front 77 00:03:51,159 --> 00:03:55,599 of it-- minus-- lower the degree on the s-- 78 00:03:55,599 --> 00:03:57,879 minus s to the third. 79 00:03:57,879 --> 00:04:00,060 And then you could kind of say, let's take the, you know, 80 00:04:00,060 --> 00:04:06,210 so form of derivative, so you get y of 0-- it's not a real 81 00:04:06,210 --> 00:04:06,480 derivative. 82 00:04:06,479 --> 00:04:09,215 The Laplace Transform really isn't the anti-derivative of y 83 00:04:09,215 --> 00:04:11,500 of 0, but anyway, I think you get the idea. 84 00:04:11,500 --> 00:04:15,259 And then we lower the degree on s again, minus s squared, 85 00:04:15,259 --> 00:04:16,449 take the derivative. 86 00:04:16,449 --> 00:04:17,819 And of course these aren't functions. 87 00:04:17,819 --> 00:04:21,349 But we're evaluating the derivative of that 88 00:04:21,350 --> 00:04:23,110 function now of 0. 89 00:04:23,110 --> 00:04:28,350 So y prime of 0, minus-- now we lower the degree one more-- 90 00:04:28,350 --> 00:04:37,450 minus s, times-- this is an s-- times y prime prime of 0. 91 00:04:37,449 --> 00:04:38,670 We have one more term. 92 00:04:38,670 --> 00:04:40,520 Lower the degree on the s one more time. 93 00:04:40,519 --> 00:04:41,979 Then you get s to the 0, which is just 1. 94 00:04:41,980 --> 00:04:45,560 So minus-- and 1 is a coefficient-- and then you 95 00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:50,281 have y, the third derivative of y-- let me scroll over a 96 00:04:50,281 --> 00:04:52,329 little bit-- the third derivative of y 97 00:04:52,329 --> 00:04:53,430 evaluated at 0. 98 00:04:53,430 --> 00:04:54,860 So I think you see the pattern now. 99 00:04:54,860 --> 00:04:59,460 And this is a much faster way of evaluating the Laplace 100 00:04:59,459 --> 00:05:02,989 Transform of an arbitrary derivative of y, as opposed to 101 00:05:02,990 --> 00:05:07,090 keep going through that pattern over and over again. 102 00:05:07,089 --> 00:05:09,500 Another thing I want to introduce you to is just a 103 00:05:09,500 --> 00:05:11,850 notational savings. 104 00:05:11,850 --> 00:05:13,990 And it's just something that you'll see, so you might as 105 00:05:13,990 --> 00:05:15,329 well get used to it. 106 00:05:15,329 --> 00:05:17,789 And it actually saves time over, you know, keep writing 107 00:05:17,790 --> 00:05:19,819 this curly L in this bracket. 108 00:05:19,819 --> 00:05:27,110 If I have the Laplace Transform of y of t, I can 109 00:05:27,110 --> 00:05:31,330 write as, and people tend to write it as-- well, it's going 110 00:05:31,329 --> 00:05:37,000 to be a function of s, and what they use is a capital Y 111 00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:38,720 to denote the function of s. 112 00:05:38,720 --> 00:05:41,360 113 00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:44,910 It makes sense, because normally when we're doing 114 00:05:44,910 --> 00:05:48,880 antiderivatives, you just take-- you know, when you 115 00:05:48,879 --> 00:05:50,659 learn the fundamental theorem of calculus, you learn that 116 00:05:50,660 --> 00:05:56,620 the integral of f with respect to dx, you know, from 0 to x, 117 00:05:56,620 --> 00:05:59,579 is equal to capital F of x. 118 00:05:59,579 --> 00:06:03,079 So it's kind of borrowing that notation, because this 119 00:06:03,079 --> 00:06:06,550 function of s is kind of an integral of y of t. 120 00:06:06,550 --> 00:06:11,210 The Laplace Transform, to some degree, is like a special type 121 00:06:11,209 --> 00:06:13,209 of integral where you have a little exponential function in 122 00:06:13,209 --> 00:06:15,799 there to mess around with things a little bit. 123 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:17,829 Anyway, I just wanted you to get used to this notation. 124 00:06:17,829 --> 00:06:20,409 When you see capital Y of s, that's the same thing as a 125 00:06:20,410 --> 00:06:22,189 Laplace Transform of y of t. 126 00:06:22,189 --> 00:06:25,819 And you might also see it this way. 127 00:06:25,819 --> 00:06:36,250 The Laplace Transform of f of t is equal to capital F of s. 128 00:06:36,250 --> 00:06:39,139 And the clue that tells you that this isn't just a normal 129 00:06:39,139 --> 00:06:42,949 antiderivative, is the fact that they're using that s as 130 00:06:42,949 --> 00:06:44,110 the independent variable. 131 00:06:44,110 --> 00:06:46,620 Because in general, s represents the frequency 132 00:06:46,620 --> 00:06:49,250 domain, and if people were to use s with just a general 133 00:06:49,250 --> 00:06:51,350 antiderivative, people would get confused, 134 00:06:51,350 --> 00:06:53,350 et cetera, et cetera. 135 00:06:53,350 --> 00:06:56,520 Anyway, I'm trying to think whether I have time to teach 136 00:06:56,519 --> 00:07:00,479 you more fascinating concepts of Laplace Transform. 137 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:02,259 Well, sure, I think we do. 138 00:07:02,259 --> 00:07:04,586 So my next question for you-- and now we'll teach you a 139 00:07:04,586 --> 00:07:06,660 couple more properties, and this'll be helpful in taking 140 00:07:06,660 --> 00:07:13,750 Laplace Transforms. What is the Laplace Transform of e to 141 00:07:13,750 --> 00:07:19,160 the at times f of t? 142 00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:20,170 Fascinating. 143 00:07:20,170 --> 00:07:22,140 Well, let's just should go back to our definition of the 144 00:07:22,139 --> 00:07:24,699 Laplace Transform. 145 00:07:24,699 --> 00:07:30,879 It is the integral from 0 to infinity of e to the minus st 146 00:07:30,879 --> 00:07:34,310 times whatever we have between the curly brackets. 147 00:07:34,310 --> 00:07:43,980 So, with the curly brackets we have e to the at f of t dt. 148 00:07:43,980 --> 00:07:45,550 And now we can add these exponents. 149 00:07:45,550 --> 00:07:47,629 We have a similar base, so this is equal to what? 150 00:07:47,629 --> 00:07:53,659 This is equal to the integral from 0 to infinity. 151 00:07:53,660 --> 00:07:56,439 And let's see, I want to write it as, I could write it minus 152 00:07:56,439 --> 00:08:02,680 s plus a, but I'm going to write it as minus s minus a t. 153 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:03,790 And you could expand this out. 154 00:08:03,790 --> 00:08:06,490 It becomes minus s plus a, which is exactly what we have 155 00:08:06,490 --> 00:08:12,280 here, times f of t dt. 156 00:08:12,279 --> 00:08:14,189 Now let me show you something. 157 00:08:14,189 --> 00:08:24,300 if I were to just take the Laplace Transform of f of t, 158 00:08:24,300 --> 00:08:26,319 that is equal to some function of s. 159 00:08:26,319 --> 00:08:30,399 160 00:08:30,399 --> 00:08:33,389 Whatever we essentially have right here for s, it becomes 161 00:08:33,389 --> 00:08:35,439 some function of that. 162 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:36,900 So this is interesting. 163 00:08:36,899 --> 00:08:38,819 This is some function of s. 164 00:08:38,820 --> 00:08:42,309 Here, all we did to go from-- well actually 165 00:08:42,308 --> 00:08:43,079 let me rewrite this. 166 00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:49,590 The Laplace, which is equal to 0 to infinity e to the minus 167 00:08:49,590 --> 00:08:55,379 st f of t dt. 168 00:08:55,379 --> 00:08:58,639 The Laplace Transform of just f of t is equal to this, which 169 00:08:58,639 --> 00:09:01,259 is some function of s. 170 00:09:01,259 --> 00:09:06,200 Well, the Laplace Transform of e to the at, times f of t, it 171 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:06,800 equals this. 172 00:09:06,799 --> 00:09:10,509 And what's the difference between this and this? 173 00:09:10,509 --> 00:09:12,769 What's the difference between the two? 174 00:09:12,769 --> 00:09:13,909 Well, it's not much. 175 00:09:13,909 --> 00:09:19,429 Here, wherever I have an s, I have an s minus a here. 176 00:09:19,429 --> 00:09:22,349 So if this is a function of s, what's this going to be? 177 00:09:22,350 --> 00:09:24,149 It's going to be that same function. 178 00:09:24,149 --> 00:09:27,220 Whatever the Laplace Transform of f was, it's going to be 179 00:09:27,220 --> 00:09:29,450 that same function, but instead of s, it's going to be 180 00:09:29,450 --> 00:09:33,509 a function of s minus a. 181 00:09:33,509 --> 00:09:35,539 And once again, how did I get that? 182 00:09:35,539 --> 00:09:38,199 Well I said the Laplace Transform of f is a function 183 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:40,940 of s, and it's equal to this. 184 00:09:40,940 --> 00:09:44,420 Well if I just replace an s with an s minus a, I get this, 185 00:09:44,419 --> 00:09:46,389 which is a function of s minus a. 186 00:09:46,389 --> 00:09:48,679 Which was the Laplace Transform of e to the 187 00:09:48,679 --> 00:09:50,489 at times f of t. 188 00:09:50,490 --> 00:09:52,360 Maybe that's a little confusing. 189 00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:54,919 Let me show you an example. 190 00:09:54,919 --> 00:10:03,389 Let's just take the Laplace Transform of cosine of 2t. 191 00:10:03,389 --> 00:10:08,720 We've shown is equal to-- well I'll write the notation-- it's 192 00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:10,865 equal to some function of s. 193 00:10:10,865 --> 00:10:15,110 And that function of s is s over s squared plus 4. 194 00:10:15,110 --> 00:10:16,940 We've shown that already. 195 00:10:16,940 --> 00:10:25,120 And so the Laplace Transform of e to the, I don't know, 3t 196 00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:29,820 times cosine of 2t, is going to be equal to the same 197 00:10:29,820 --> 00:10:31,970 function, but instead of s, it's going to be a 198 00:10:31,970 --> 00:10:34,759 function of s minus a. 199 00:10:34,759 --> 00:10:46,169 So s minus 3, which is equal to s minus 3 over s minus 3 200 00:10:46,169 --> 00:10:52,219 squared plus 4. 201 00:10:52,220 --> 00:10:55,320 Notice, when you just multiply something by this, either the 202 00:10:55,320 --> 00:10:58,230 3t and then or either the at, you take the Laplace Transform 203 00:10:58,230 --> 00:11:00,690 of it, you just-- it's the same thing as the Laplace 204 00:11:00,690 --> 00:11:03,010 Transform of this function, but everywhere where you had 205 00:11:03,009 --> 00:11:06,840 an s, you replace it with an s minus this a. 206 00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:08,870 Anyway, I hope I didn't confuse you too much 207 00:11:08,870 --> 00:11:09,600 with that last part. 208 00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:11,970 I think my power adaptor actually just went on. 209 00:11:11,970 --> 00:11:14,210 I hope the video keeps recording. 210 00:11:14,210 --> 00:11:16,540 I'll see you in the next one.