1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,790 2 00:00:00,790 --> 00:00:04,310 Let's think about what might happen to the boiling point or 3 00:00:04,309 --> 00:00:08,550 the freezing point of any solution if we start adding 4 00:00:08,550 --> 00:00:10,860 particles, or we start adding solute to it. 5 00:00:10,859 --> 00:00:14,469 For our visualization, let's just think about water again. 6 00:00:14,470 --> 00:00:15,550 It doesn't have to be water. 7 00:00:15,550 --> 00:00:17,880 It can be any solvent, but let's just think about water 8 00:00:17,879 --> 00:00:19,640 in its liquid state. 9 00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:24,100 The particles are reasonably disorganized because of their 10 00:00:24,100 --> 00:00:27,150 kinetic energy, but they still have that hydrogen bonds that 11 00:00:27,149 --> 00:00:30,339 wants to make them be near each other. 12 00:00:30,339 --> 00:00:32,240 So this is in the liquid state, and they have a 13 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:34,740 reasonable amount of kinetic energy. 14 00:00:34,740 --> 00:00:37,120 You know, each of these particles is moving in some 15 00:00:37,119 --> 00:00:39,459 direction, rubbing against each other, bouncing off of 16 00:00:39,460 --> 00:00:40,490 each other. 17 00:00:40,490 --> 00:00:44,910 Now, to move it into the solid state, or to freeze it, what 18 00:00:44,909 --> 00:00:46,250 has to happen? 19 00:00:46,250 --> 00:00:48,619 The ice has to enter kind of a crystalline structure. 20 00:00:48,619 --> 00:00:51,709 It has to get pretty organized, so let's say it has 21 00:00:51,710 --> 00:00:54,530 to look something like this. 22 00:00:54,530 --> 00:00:56,609 The water molecules are going to have a regular structure 23 00:00:56,609 --> 00:01:01,460 where the hydrogen bonds dominate any kind of kinetic 24 00:01:01,460 --> 00:01:03,340 movement they want to do, and all the kinetic movement, 25 00:01:03,340 --> 00:01:04,980 they're just vibrating in place. 26 00:01:04,980 --> 00:01:07,840 So you have to get a little bit orderly 27 00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:10,060 right there, right? 28 00:01:10,060 --> 00:01:12,310 And then, obviously, this lattice structure goes on and 29 00:01:12,310 --> 00:01:17,150 on with a gazillion water molecules. 30 00:01:17,150 --> 00:01:19,469 But the interesting thing is that this 31 00:01:19,469 --> 00:01:20,879 somehow has to get organized. 32 00:01:20,879 --> 00:01:25,539 And what happens if we start introducing molecules into 33 00:01:25,540 --> 00:01:26,250 this water? 34 00:01:26,250 --> 00:01:30,129 Let's say the example of sodium-- actually, I won't do 35 00:01:30,129 --> 00:01:30,750 any example. 36 00:01:30,750 --> 00:01:32,769 Let's just say some arbitrary molecule, if I were to 37 00:01:32,769 --> 00:01:35,069 introduce it there, if I were to put something-- 38 00:01:35,069 --> 00:01:35,929 let me draw it again. 39 00:01:35,930 --> 00:01:40,350 So now I'll just use that same-- I'll introduce some 40 00:01:40,349 --> 00:01:43,299 molecules, and let's say they're pretty large, so they 41 00:01:43,299 --> 00:01:46,060 push all of these water molecules out of the way. 42 00:01:46,060 --> 00:01:48,900 So the water molecules are now on the outside of that, and 43 00:01:48,900 --> 00:01:52,890 let's have another one that's over here, some relatively 44 00:01:52,890 --> 00:01:55,859 large molecules of solute relative to water, and this is 45 00:01:55,859 --> 00:01:58,890 because a water molecule really isn't that big. 46 00:01:58,890 --> 00:02:02,310 Now, do you think it's going to be easier or harder to 47 00:02:02,310 --> 00:02:03,219 freeze this? 48 00:02:03,219 --> 00:02:06,039 Are you going to have to remove more or less energy to 49 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:08,199 get to a frozen state? 50 00:02:08,199 --> 00:02:10,979 Well, because these molecules, they're not going to be part 51 00:02:10,979 --> 00:02:13,690 of this lattice structure because frankly, they wouldn't 52 00:02:13,689 --> 00:02:14,780 even fit into it. 53 00:02:14,780 --> 00:02:16,990 They're actually going to make it harder for these water 54 00:02:16,990 --> 00:02:20,495 molecules to get organized because to get organized, they 55 00:02:20,495 --> 00:02:22,500 have to get at the right distance for the hydrogen 56 00:02:22,500 --> 00:02:23,330 bonds to form. 57 00:02:23,330 --> 00:02:26,600 But in this case, even as you start removing heat from the 58 00:02:26,599 --> 00:02:33,000 system, maybe the ones that aren't near the solute 59 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:35,439 particles, they'll start to organize with each other. 60 00:02:35,439 --> 00:02:39,020 61 00:02:39,020 --> 00:02:41,500 But then when you introduce a solute particle, let's say a 62 00:02:41,500 --> 00:02:44,740 solute particle is sitting right here. 63 00:02:44,740 --> 00:02:47,340 It's going to be very hard for someone to organize with this 64 00:02:47,340 --> 00:02:50,240 guy, to get near enough for the hydrogen bond to start 65 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:52,469 taking hold. 66 00:02:52,469 --> 00:02:54,280 This distance would make it very difficult. 67 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:57,219 And so the way I think about it is that these solute 68 00:02:57,219 --> 00:03:00,169 particles make the structure irregular, or they add more 69 00:03:00,169 --> 00:03:01,709 disorder, and we'll eventually talk about 70 00:03:01,710 --> 00:03:03,000 entropy and all of that. 71 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:05,500 But they make it more irregular, and it's making it 72 00:03:05,500 --> 00:03:08,129 harder to get into a regular form. 73 00:03:08,129 --> 00:03:12,099 And so the intuition is is that this should lower the 74 00:03:12,099 --> 00:03:13,960 boiling point or make it-- oh, sorry, 75 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:14,780 lower the melting point. 76 00:03:14,780 --> 00:03:27,439 So solute particles make you have a lower boiling point. 77 00:03:27,439 --> 00:03:30,300 Let's say if we're talking about water at standard 78 00:03:30,300 --> 00:03:33,870 temperature and pressure or at one atmosphere then instead of 79 00:03:33,870 --> 00:03:36,390 going to 0 degrees, you might have to go to negative 1 or 80 00:03:36,389 --> 00:03:38,329 negative 2 degrees, and we're going to talk a little bit 81 00:03:38,330 --> 00:03:39,800 about what that is. 82 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:43,400 Now, what's the intuition of what this will do when you 83 00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:45,080 want to go into a gaseous state, when you 84 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:45,850 want to boil it? 85 00:03:45,849 --> 00:03:49,319 So my initial gut was, hey, I'm already in a disordered 86 00:03:49,319 --> 00:03:53,389 state, which is closer to what a gas is, so wouldn't that 87 00:03:53,389 --> 00:03:54,619 make it easier to boil? 88 00:03:54,620 --> 00:03:57,039 But it turns out it also makes it harder to boil, and this is 89 00:03:57,039 --> 00:03:58,169 how I think about it. 90 00:03:58,169 --> 00:04:00,780 Remember, everything with boiling deals with what's 91 00:04:00,780 --> 00:04:04,020 happening at the surface, and we talked about that in our 92 00:04:04,020 --> 00:04:05,159 vapor pressure. 93 00:04:05,159 --> 00:04:08,979 So at the surface, we said if I have a bunch of water 94 00:04:08,979 --> 00:04:15,389 molecules in the liquid state, we knew that although the 95 00:04:15,389 --> 00:04:19,000 average temperature might not be high enough for the water 96 00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:21,680 molecules to evaporate, that there's a distribution of 97 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:22,480 kinetic energies. 98 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:24,580 And some of these water molecules on the surface 99 00:04:24,579 --> 00:04:27,069 because the surface ones might be going 100 00:04:27,069 --> 00:04:29,029 fast enough to escape. 101 00:04:29,029 --> 00:04:33,339 And when they escape into vapor, then they create a 102 00:04:33,339 --> 00:04:34,509 vapor pressure above here. 103 00:04:34,509 --> 00:04:37,550 And if that vapor pressure is high enough, you can almost 104 00:04:37,550 --> 00:04:40,910 view them as linemen blocking the way for more molecules to 105 00:04:40,910 --> 00:04:43,530 kind of run behind them as they block all of the other 106 00:04:43,529 --> 00:04:46,929 ambient air pressure above them. 107 00:04:46,930 --> 00:04:49,980 So if there's enough of them and they have enough energy, 108 00:04:49,980 --> 00:04:54,180 they can start to push back or to push outward is the way I 109 00:04:54,180 --> 00:04:57,410 think about it, so that more guys can come in behind them. 110 00:04:57,410 --> 00:05:00,910 So I hope that lineman analogy doesn't completely lose you. 111 00:05:00,910 --> 00:05:04,210 Now, what happens if you were to introduce solute into it? 112 00:05:04,209 --> 00:05:06,209 Some of the solute particle might be down here. 113 00:05:06,209 --> 00:05:09,169 It probably doesn't have much of an effect down here, but 114 00:05:09,170 --> 00:05:12,290 some of it's going to be bouncing on the surface, so 115 00:05:12,290 --> 00:05:15,020 they're going to be taking up some of the surface area. 116 00:05:15,019 --> 00:05:17,310 And because, and this is at least how I think of it, since 117 00:05:17,310 --> 00:05:19,589 they're going to be taking up some of the surface area, 118 00:05:19,589 --> 00:05:22,299 you're going to have less surface area exposed to the 119 00:05:22,300 --> 00:05:25,199 solvent particle or to the solution or the stuff that'll 120 00:05:25,199 --> 00:05:26,079 actually vaporize. 121 00:05:26,079 --> 00:05:27,819 You're going to have a lower vapor pressure. 122 00:05:27,819 --> 00:05:33,610 123 00:05:33,610 --> 00:05:36,250 And remember, your boiling point is when the vapor 124 00:05:36,250 --> 00:05:39,019 pressure, when you have enough particles with enough kinetic 125 00:05:39,019 --> 00:05:41,819 energy out here to start pushing against the 126 00:05:41,819 --> 00:05:44,339 atmospheric pressure, when the vapor pressure is equal to the 127 00:05:44,339 --> 00:05:45,799 atmospheric pressure, you start boiling. 128 00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:49,100 But because of these guys, I have a lower vapor pressure. 129 00:05:49,100 --> 00:05:51,170 So I'm going to have to add even more kinetic energy, more 130 00:05:51,170 --> 00:05:54,030 heat to the system in order to get enough vapor pressure up 131 00:05:54,029 --> 00:05:57,129 here to start pushing back the atmospheric pressure. 132 00:05:57,129 --> 00:06:02,439 So solute also raises the boiling point. 133 00:06:02,439 --> 00:06:05,449 134 00:06:05,449 --> 00:06:08,229 So the way that you can think about it is solute, when you 135 00:06:08,230 --> 00:06:11,780 add something to a solution, it's going to make it want to 136 00:06:11,779 --> 00:06:13,829 be in the liquid state more. 137 00:06:13,829 --> 00:06:15,519 Whether you lower the temperature, it's going to 138 00:06:15,519 --> 00:06:17,579 want to stay in liquid as opposed to ice, and if you 139 00:06:17,579 --> 00:06:19,000 raise the temperature, it's going to want to stay in 140 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:20,529 liquid as opposed to gas. 141 00:06:20,529 --> 00:06:22,459 I found this neat-- hopefully, it shows up 142 00:06:22,459 --> 00:06:23,849 well on this video. 143 00:06:23,850 --> 00:06:26,205 I have to give due credit, this is from chem.purdue.edu/ 144 00:06:26,204 --> 00:06:34,819 gchelp/solutions/eboil.html, but I thought it was a pretty 145 00:06:34,819 --> 00:06:37,689 neat graphic, or at least a visualization. 146 00:06:37,689 --> 00:06:39,969 This is just the surface of water molecules, and it gives 147 00:06:39,970 --> 00:06:43,060 you a sense of just how things vaporize as well. 148 00:06:43,060 --> 00:06:46,089 There's some things on the surface that just bounce off. 149 00:06:46,089 --> 00:06:48,969 And here's an example where they visualized sodium 150 00:06:48,970 --> 00:06:50,390 chloride at the surface. 151 00:06:50,389 --> 00:06:52,909 And because the sodium chloride is kind of bouncing 152 00:06:52,910 --> 00:06:56,120 around on the surface with the water molecules, fewer of 153 00:06:56,120 --> 00:06:59,879 those water molecules kind of have the room to escape, so 154 00:06:59,879 --> 00:07:03,050 the boiling point gets elevated. 155 00:07:03,050 --> 00:07:06,079 Now, the question is by how much does it get elevated? 156 00:07:06,079 --> 00:07:08,899 And this is one of the neat things in life is that the 157 00:07:08,899 --> 00:07:11,729 answer is actually quite simple. 158 00:07:11,730 --> 00:07:17,860 The change in boiling or freezing point, so the change 159 00:07:17,860 --> 00:07:24,970 in temperature of vaporization, is equal to some 160 00:07:24,970 --> 00:07:31,120 constant times the number of moles, or at least the mole 161 00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:37,590 concentration, the molality, times the molality of the 162 00:07:37,589 --> 00:07:41,199 solute that you're putting into your solution. 163 00:07:41,199 --> 00:07:51,229 So, for example, let's say I have 1 kilogram of-- so let's 164 00:07:51,230 --> 00:07:55,790 say my solvent is water. 165 00:07:55,790 --> 00:07:57,840 I'll switch colors. 166 00:07:57,839 --> 00:08:00,109 And I have 1 kilogram of water, and let's say we're 167 00:08:00,110 --> 00:08:02,020 just at atmospheric pressure. 168 00:08:02,019 --> 00:08:08,039 And let's say I have some sodium chloride, NaCl. 169 00:08:08,040 --> 00:08:14,170 And let's say I have 2 moles of NaCl. 170 00:08:14,170 --> 00:08:15,420 I'll have 2 moles. 171 00:08:15,420 --> 00:08:17,670 172 00:08:17,670 --> 00:08:23,480 The question is how much will this raise the boiling point 173 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:24,610 of this water? 174 00:08:24,610 --> 00:08:31,069 So first of all, you just have to figure out the molality, 175 00:08:31,069 --> 00:08:36,298 which is just equal to the number of moles of solute, 176 00:08:36,298 --> 00:08:42,158 this 2 moles, divided by the number of 177 00:08:42,158 --> 00:08:43,569 kilograms of solvent. 178 00:08:43,570 --> 00:08:51,610 So let's say we have 1 kilogram of solvent. 179 00:08:51,610 --> 00:08:54,090 This was, of course, moles. 180 00:08:54,090 --> 00:08:56,820 So our molality is 2 moles per kilogram. 181 00:08:56,820 --> 00:08:59,840 So we just have to figure out what this constant is, and 182 00:08:59,840 --> 00:09:01,225 then we'll know the temperature elevation. 183 00:09:01,225 --> 00:09:03,430 And actually, that same Purdue site, they 184 00:09:03,429 --> 00:09:04,509 gave a list of tables. 185 00:09:04,509 --> 00:09:07,145 I haven't run the experiments myself. 186 00:09:07,145 --> 00:09:08,759 They have some neat charts here. 187 00:09:08,759 --> 00:09:11,639 But they say, OK water, normal boiling point is 100 degrees 188 00:09:11,639 --> 00:09:15,199 Celsius at standard atmospheric pressure. 189 00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:19,740 And then they say that the constant is 0.512 Celsius 190 00:09:19,740 --> 00:09:21,360 degrees per mole. 191 00:09:21,360 --> 00:09:24,070 So let's just say 0.5. 192 00:09:24,070 --> 00:09:25,320 So it equals 0.5. 193 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:27,700 194 00:09:27,700 --> 00:09:28,950 So k is equal to 0.5. 195 00:09:28,950 --> 00:09:32,430 196 00:09:32,429 --> 00:09:35,669 And I want to be very clear here because this is a very-- 197 00:09:35,669 --> 00:09:38,039 I won't say a subtle point, but it's an interesting point. 198 00:09:38,039 --> 00:09:41,349 So I said that there's 2-- the molality of-- I just realized 199 00:09:41,350 --> 00:09:42,029 I made a mistake. 200 00:09:42,029 --> 00:09:44,709 I said the molality of sodium chloride is 2. 201 00:09:44,710 --> 00:09:47,620 2 moles per kilograms. But that would be if sodium 202 00:09:47,620 --> 00:09:51,940 chloride stayed in this molecular state, if it stayed 203 00:09:51,940 --> 00:09:53,840 together, right? 204 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:56,149 But what happens is that the sodium chloride actually 205 00:09:56,149 --> 00:09:57,789 disassociates, and we learned all about it in 206 00:09:57,789 --> 00:09:59,429 that previous video. 207 00:09:59,429 --> 00:10:04,750 Each molecule or each sodium chloride pair disassociates 208 00:10:04,750 --> 00:10:08,809 into two molecules, into a sodium ion 209 00:10:08,809 --> 00:10:12,429 and a chlorine anion. 210 00:10:12,429 --> 00:10:15,819 And because of that, because this disassociates into two, 211 00:10:15,820 --> 00:10:18,950 the molality is actually going to be two times the number of 212 00:10:18,950 --> 00:10:22,670 moles of sodium chloride I have. So it's going to be two 213 00:10:22,669 --> 00:10:23,729 times this. 214 00:10:23,730 --> 00:10:26,039 So my molality will actually be 4. 215 00:10:26,039 --> 00:10:26,889 And this is an interesting point. 216 00:10:26,889 --> 00:10:30,699 If I was dealing with-- and I wrote it here. 217 00:10:30,700 --> 00:10:36,400 So this right here is glucose, and this is sodium chloride, 218 00:10:36,399 --> 00:10:38,370 or at least sodium chloride in its crystal form. 219 00:10:38,370 --> 00:10:43,080 One molecule, I guess you can view it, or one salt of it. 220 00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:45,310 I guess you could just view it as one of these little pairs 221 00:10:45,309 --> 00:10:46,319 right here. 222 00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:48,780 But the interesting thing is is you could have the same 223 00:10:48,779 --> 00:10:51,319 number of moles of sodium chloride when you view it as a 224 00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:53,230 compound and glucose. 225 00:10:53,230 --> 00:10:56,730 But glucose, when it goes into water, it just stays as one 226 00:10:56,730 --> 00:10:58,460 molecule of glucose. 227 00:10:58,460 --> 00:11:01,990 So a mole of glucose will disassociate into a mole of 228 00:11:01,990 --> 00:11:03,169 glucose in water. 229 00:11:03,169 --> 00:11:04,949 Well, I guess it won't disassociate. 230 00:11:04,950 --> 00:11:07,509 It'll just stay as one mole, while a mole of sodium 231 00:11:07,509 --> 00:11:10,490 chloride will turn into two moles because it 232 00:11:10,490 --> 00:11:11,480 disassociates. 233 00:11:11,480 --> 00:11:13,889 It turns into two separate particles. 234 00:11:13,889 --> 00:11:18,779 So in my example, when I start with a mole of this, I end 235 00:11:18,779 --> 00:11:26,909 up-- actually, once I dissolve it in water, I ended up with 4 236 00:11:26,909 --> 00:11:28,889 moles per kilogram of molality, because this turns 237 00:11:28,889 --> 00:11:30,279 into two particles. 238 00:11:30,279 --> 00:11:34,600 So given that the molality is 4 moles. 239 00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:38,240 2 moles of sodium, 2 moles of chloride per kilogram. 240 00:11:38,240 --> 00:11:42,269 So I just use that constant that I just got from Purdue. 241 00:11:42,269 --> 00:11:46,100 And I get the change in temperature is equal to that 242 00:11:46,100 --> 00:11:54,909 constant, 0.5, times 4, which is equal to 2 degrees. 243 00:11:54,909 --> 00:11:59,439 So my boiling point will be elevated by 2 degrees. 244 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:03,970 Now, if I had the same number of moles, if I had 2 moles of 245 00:12:03,970 --> 00:12:08,460 glucose dissolved into my water, I'd only get half as 246 00:12:08,460 --> 00:12:10,610 much, half as much of an increase. 247 00:12:10,610 --> 00:12:13,149 Because the molality would be half as much. 248 00:12:13,149 --> 00:12:15,209 Because it doesn't turn into two particles. 249 00:12:15,210 --> 00:12:16,720 In some textbooks, you'll actually see it 250 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:18,090 written like this. 251 00:12:18,090 --> 00:12:22,990 You'll actually see the same formula written like change in 252 00:12:22,990 --> 00:12:25,860 boiling temperature, or vapor temperature, or whatever you 253 00:12:25,860 --> 00:12:30,250 want to think, is equal to k times m times i, where they'll 254 00:12:30,250 --> 00:12:34,269 say this is the molality of the compound 255 00:12:34,269 --> 00:12:35,110 you're talking about. 256 00:12:35,110 --> 00:12:39,879 In this case, this number would be 2, and i is the 257 00:12:39,879 --> 00:12:43,330 number of molecules or the number of things that it 258 00:12:43,330 --> 00:12:44,639 disassociates into. 259 00:12:44,639 --> 00:12:46,909 So in this case, this would have been 2. 260 00:12:46,909 --> 00:12:49,519 And that's where we would have gotten 4 times k, which is 261 00:12:49,519 --> 00:12:51,019 0.5, which is 2. 262 00:12:51,019 --> 00:12:53,179 In the case of water, this would be-- oh, sorry, in the 263 00:12:53,179 --> 00:12:55,389 case of the glucose, this would still be 2. 264 00:12:55,389 --> 00:12:57,399 But it only turns into one particle when it goes in the 265 00:12:57,399 --> 00:12:58,639 water, so that would be 1. 266 00:12:58,639 --> 00:13:02,370 So you would only have a 1 degree increase in the boiling 267 00:13:02,370 --> 00:13:03,370 point of water. 268 00:13:03,370 --> 00:13:06,460 Now, freezing point is the same thing. 269 00:13:06,460 --> 00:13:10,500 Change in freezing point is also 270 00:13:10,500 --> 00:13:13,179 proportional to the molality. 271 00:13:13,179 --> 00:13:15,799 And you can either say the molality of the original 272 00:13:15,799 --> 00:13:18,689 non-in-water compound times the number of compounds it 273 00:13:18,690 --> 00:13:22,290 disassociates into, although this k is going to be 274 00:13:22,289 --> 00:13:26,439 different for freezing than it is for boiling. 275 00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:29,660 Of course, this k changes at different pressures and for 276 00:13:29,659 --> 00:13:30,370 different elements. 277 00:13:30,370 --> 00:13:33,950 But the really big takeaway is just to realize that even if 278 00:13:33,950 --> 00:13:37,160 you have a mole of this and a mole of that, and they're 279 00:13:37,159 --> 00:13:39,809 going to be dissolved into the same amount of water, because 280 00:13:39,809 --> 00:13:42,159 this dissociates into two particles and this 281 00:13:42,159 --> 00:13:45,169 disassociates into only one for every-- or this 282 00:13:45,169 --> 00:13:47,620 disassociates into two moles for every mole of the crystal 283 00:13:47,620 --> 00:13:50,610 you have-- this doesn't disassociate; it just stays as 284 00:13:50,610 --> 00:13:53,810 one-- this'll have twice as large of an effect on the 285 00:13:53,809 --> 00:13:57,299 freezing point change or on the boiling point elevation 286 00:13:57,299 --> 00:13:59,319 than the glucose will. 287 00:13:59,320 --> 00:13:59,737